MENUJU PEMBELAJARAN INOVATIF, Blog
ini berisi naskah-naskah pembelajaran, proposal-proposal penelitian,
artikel-artikel pembelajaran (khususnya sastra), dan hal-hal yang berkaitan
dengan pembelajaran di SD. Saya sangat berterima kasih atas tanggapan/komentar,
diskusi-diskusi, dan kritik yang membangun guna perbaikan blog ini.
Teaching and Learning
In this essay, British education
theorist Peter Newsam describes two contrasting approaches to education. The
traditional approach assumes there is a predetermined body of knowledge that
the teacher should pass on to the student. This approach uses testing and
competition to evaluate and motivate students. In the progressive approach, the
child, rather than a set body of knowledge, is the frame of reference. The
teacher’s role is to be conscious of the development stage and the capacity of
each child. The progressive method stresses cooperation rather than competition.
Newsam suggests that an effective teaching system can incorporate elements of
each approach.
Teaching and Learning
By Peter Newsam
The relationship between teaching
and learning, what and how teachers teach, and how and what learners learn has
long been a subject of controversy. The two, sometimes extreme, positions
adopted by those who engage in it can be loosely described as, on the one hand,
“traditional” and, on the other, “progressive.”
The traditional position starts from
the assumption, taken to be so obvious as not to be open to question, that the
purpose of teaching is to ensure that those taught acquire a prescribed body of
knowledge and set of values. Both knowledge and values are taken to reflect a
society’s selection of what it most wants to transmit to its future citizens
and requires its future workforce to be able to do.
An important characteristic of this
traditional view is that it seeks to convey what is already known and, at some
level, approved. The relationship between teacher and learner is determined
thereby. The learner is seen as the person who does not yet have the required
knowledge or values and the teacher as the person who has both and whose
function it is to convey them to the learner.
From the nature of this relationship,
a number of things follow: the systematic transmission of knowledge and values
from teacher to learner needs to proceed smoothly. That requires well-behaved
learners and a disciplined environment, if necessary externally imposed with
sanctions for failures in compliance. Teaching and learning also benefit from
carefully designed syllabuses and prescribed curriculum content. Furthermore,
as what has to be learned can be set out in full, stage by stage, from the
start of the educational process to its conclusion, it follows that what is
taught can be regularly tested and that each stage of teaching and learning can
best be seen as a preparation for the next. It also follows that, as individual
learners learn at different speeds and are capable of reaching different levels
of achievement, it seems sensible to arrange learners in groups of similar
abilities, either at different schools or in graduated classes within schools.
Finally, so far as human motivation is concerned, competition is seen to be the
predominant way to encourage learners or institutions to strive to improve
their performance in relation to that of others.
The opposed view, broadly described
as “progressive” or “child-centered,” starts from the learner rather than from
any predetermined body of knowledge. On this view, the function of the teacher,
from parent in the earliest years right through the years of school attendance,
is to be aware of each child’s capacity and stage of development. The primary
importance of children’s learning, which in turn is taken to depend on that
stage of development, requires each of those stages to be seen as important in
its own right rather than as a preparation for some later stage. An
eight-year-old child, for example, is seen as an eight year old to be developed
to his or her full potential as an eight year old, rather than as a future nine
or fifteen year old. The curriculum itself tends to be seen, in the words of
the Report of the Consultative Committee on the Primary School as open-ended
and inquiry-based: “the curriculum is to be thought of in terms of activity and
experience rather than of knowledge to be acquired and facts to be stored.”
So far as values are concerned, the
progressive approach tends to see attempts to teach or improve these directly as
less effective than creating schools which exemplify values of greatest
relevance to the young. Hence the importance placed on the way individuals,
adults and learners alike, are encouraged to behave towards each other. A
disciplined environment, rather than being externally imposed, is a direct
consequence of that process. Social values, cooperation rather than competition
and equal value given to the efforts of the least as well as the most able, are
emphasized. Finally, as a point of principle, it is assumed all can succeed at
some level in some aspects of learning. As one 19th-century educator insisted:
“All can walk part of the way with genius.” Sharply differentiated forms of
education, with children attending schools or classes confined to those with
particular levels of aptitude, however assessed, are thought to conflict with
this principle. By inducing a sense of failure in children allocated to what
are seen, by others and themselves, as schools or classes with lower standards
than others, general levels of achievement are thought to be depressed and an
unmotivated and under-achieving group of children unnecessarily created.
The opposed concepts implicit in
“traditional” and “progressive” attitudes to teaching and learning reflect
approaches regarded by those holding one or other of them as self-evident: that
it must be right to start from what needs to be taught or, conversely, that it
must be right to start from the learner whose success in learning it is the
purpose of teaching to ensure.
The virtual impossibility of
reconciling these two diverse approaches, at least in their extreme forms, has
led to each being caricatured, often in metaphorical terms. Traditional
education’s perception of children, in an extreme form, was described by
Charles Dickens in Hard Times as seeing them as: “little vessels
arranged in order, ready to have imperial gallons of facts poured into them
until they were full to the brim.” In short, like a kettle that has to be
filled from a tap, the traditional learner is taken to be a passive recipient
of whatever is being taught. Further, because the traditional approach to
education requires a degree of memorization, the ability to recall with
precision what has been taught in the terms in which it has to be reproduced by
the learner, this feature is disparagingly described as “learning by rote.” The
implication is that the learner’s mind has not been required to be engaged in
the process. Finally, the assumption that, to the traditionalist, knowledge is
something that already exists, causes this approach to be seen as
backward-looking at a time when new knowledge is being created and reshaped at
a bewildering rate.
Criticisms of progressive education,
particularly in its extreme forms, have concentrated on the folly, as this is
perceived, of allowing children to decide when and how they are to learn
anything. Lack of externally imposed discipline has led to some schools where,
as one inspector of schools described it, “it is like a wet play-time all day.”
The emphasis on growth and development, with analogies to the way plants move
naturally through their lives without constantly being told what to become, has
been particularly criticized. The simple notion of growth carries with it no
implication as to the direction that growth is taking. Growth, progressives are
thought to ignore, may as easily be in an unwholesome direction as a healthy
one. This leads to values being seen to be relative, with no one set of values
inherently to be preferred to any others. Yet what ought to be, values of any
kind, cannot be derived from what is; and it is a naturalistic fallacy to
suppose otherwise. Finally, because the teacher is not seen as at the center of
the educational process, he or she is reduced to becoming a “facilitator” of
children’s learning; in extreme cases unprepared even to answer simple
questions or directly to teach anything at all, on the assumption that the only
things a learner really learns are those things which he or she has “discovered
for himself.”
Between the two extreme positions,
reconciliation has proved difficult. Historically, the traditional approach has
been dominant and continues to be held particularly firmly by those who
themselves were able, well-motivated learners and as such required little more
of their teachers than specific instruction. Progressive approaches have tended
to be favored by teachers or theoreticians whose concern has been with the
education of all children, including the able and the well-motivated but with
particular attention to the needs of those with little interest in or apparent
aptitude for learning and little confidence in its relevance to their own
lives.
In practice, neither of the two
extreme approaches to teaching and learning has proved generally satisfactory.
In its starkest form, traditional education has often served able pupils well
but has been less successful with others. On the other hand, progressive
education has tended to work well enough in the early years of schooling, in
the hands of able and committed teachers, but has had less success when
attempted in other circumstances.
The need to develop systems which
incorporate the best of traditional and progressive approaches to teaching and
learning has long been evident. Fortunately, what good schools and good
teachers actually do has suggested ways forward. Increasingly, the approach
adopted places the teacher in authority, as traditionally has been the
position, but the absolute necessity of engaging learners in their own
learning, as progressive educators have argued, is seen as equally important.
Teaching, on this view, requires skillful questioning of pupils by the teacher,
rather than undue reliance on direct instruction. The purpose of that
questioning is to encourage the minds of the learners to understand, to arrange,
and to act on the material with which they are required to engage. In this
sense, learning is active; indeed it is interactive, with the teacher
responsible for ensuring the direction that this learning takes but with the
learner consistently being challenged to shape it to his or her needs.
Education of this kind has increasingly become a feature of effective schools
and school systems worldwide. In the process, the long-standing conflict
between traditional and progressive approaches to teaching and learning, with
the time-consuming controversies to which this gives rise, has a real prospect
of being resolved.
Entri
Populer
TEKNIK
PENULISAN KARYA ILMIAH 1. Pendahuluan Teknik penilisan karya ilmiah perlu
mengikuti suatu aturan yang berlaku. Terdapat dua cara ya...
I.
HAKIKAT MENULIS Konsep Menulis Menulis adalah kegiatan penyampaian pesan
(gagasan, perasaan, atau informasi) secara tertulis kepada ...
MODUL
DIKLAT MODEL-MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INOVATIF A. Tujuan: · Mendeskripsikan beberapa
model pembelajaran yang dapat diterapkan p...
I.
Konsep Menyimak A. Pendahuluan Dalam kegiatan sehari-hari, menyimak adalah
salah satu kegiatan yang sangat penting selain keterampilan ...
Membaca
permulaan merupakan tahapan proses belajar membaca bagi siswa sekolah dasar
kelas awal. Siswa belajar untuk memperoleh kemampuan dan...
Latar
Belakang dan Tujuan Materi ini disajikan agar Anda, mahasiswa PGSD dapat
bercerita, berdialog, berpidato/berceramah dan berdiskusi. ...
Membaca
permulaan merupakan tahapan proses belajar membaca bagi siswa sekolah dasar
kelas awal. Siswa belajar untuk memperoleh kemampuan dan...
Disekolah
Dasar, Pembelajaran Sastra dimaksudkan Untuk meningkatkan kemampuan siswa
mengapresiasikan karya sastra. Menurut Huck (1987 : 630-...
1.
Kurang dari 1 tahun - Belum dapat mengucapkan kata-kata, - Belum menggunakan
bahasa dalam arti yang sebenarnya, - Dapat membedakan bebe...
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar